A Day to Celebrate Climate Solutions 10-10-2010

Last year ORCA made a sign of hands for 350 day. This year ORCA needs fresh ideas and people to make them happen. With your help, 10/10/10 may be the biggest day of practical action to cut carbon that the world has seen. Without it nothing may happen.

The organisers of 350.org are calling it A Day to Celebrate Climate Solutions — together we’ll get to work in our communities on projects that can cut carbon and build the clean energy future.

But it won’t stop there – the day will be used to pressure our leaders to Get To Work themselves by passing strong climate policies promoting clean energy and reducing emissions.

Thousands of people around the world have already registered their plans, including bike repair work shoppers in San Francisco, school insulating teams in London, waste-land-to-veggies-gardeners in New Zealand, and solar panel installers in Kenya.

If you can help organise an event, don’t wait for others. Do it now…Go to 350.org A Day to Celebrate Climate Solutions and register your event…

Food Forum: 7.00 – 9.30 pm, 22 Sept. Marrar Woorn

Another Food Forum is planned for 22nd September to continue discussions started at our last Food Forum on 18th August. This was successful with some good ideas emerging from the enthusiastic group, which assembled for our film and discussion.

This forum will show ‘Food Inc’ (an unflattering look inside America’s corporate controlled food industry.) and provide a venue for people from different groups to get together and look at issues collectively. As someone mentioned in the forum, there are many different groups and clubs in Apollo Bay and we often work at issues separately. Sometimes a collective approach can be more effective. So we are happy to provide this forum as a venue for representatives from different groups, and anyone else interested in the issue, to come and work on things together.

Ideas /actions from last Forum:

  • Support permaculture group in setting up a stall for local people to sell their produce.
  • Food swap days
  • Farmers markets
  • Community Supported Agriculture in a local location
  • Food trees in nature strips and parks
  • Food and produce mapping in the region

We are open to new ideas, so if you want to come along and put in your 2 cents worth, we have another Food Forum planned for 22nd September. We will have another film and a discussion to follow.

The main aim of the Forum is to make it easier for people in the Bay to access locally-grown food. We can see that transport, because of oil shortages and rising prices, is going to become more and more expensive – which will make food more and more expensive. Also when fresh food is transported over large distances and stored for long periods it loses a lot of its goodness.

We are in a very lucky situation here in Apollo Bay, where there is ample annual rainfall, and good soils for growing food and other produce. Just imagine being able to access fresh organic food all year round. So come along, enjoy our film and be prepared for a lively discussion.

Where: Marrar Woorn
When: 7.00 – 9.30 pm, 22 September
Bring some food to nibble on.

For information on the Forum contact Magaer Lennox on 5237 9248.

Why climate science divides people along political lines

Article by George Monbiot. Published in the Guardian 24th August 2010 – posted by Anna O’Brien (former ORCA Secretary)

This was Australia’s second climate change election. Climate change deposed the former leaders of both main parties: Kevin Rudd (Labor) because his position was too weak, Malcolm Turnbull (Liberals) because his position was too strong. When Julia Gillard, the new Labor leader, also flunked the issue, many of her supporters defected to the Greens.

Labor’s collapse began when the senate rejected Rudd’s emissions trading scheme. Faced with a choice between dissolving parliament and calling an election or dropping the scheme, he chickened out and lost the confidence of the party. Julia Gillard’s support began to slide when she proposed to defer climate change policy to a citizen’s assembly(1). Nearly 70% of the votes she lost went to the Greens(2).
Turnbull, like Rudd, was ousted over the emissions trading scheme, but six months earlier. His support for the scheme split the Liberal party. Just before the first senate vote on the issue, in December last year, he was overthrown by Tony Abbott, who had told his supporters that climate change “is absolute crap”(3). If Abbott manages to form a government, he will reverse the outcome of the 2007 election, in which the Liberal Party was defeated partly because it wouldn’t act on climate change.

It’s not difficult to see why this is a hot issue in Australia. The country has been hammered by drought and bushfires. It also has the highest carbon dioxide emissions per person of any major economy outside the Arabian peninsula. Australians pollute more than Americans, twice as much as people in the UK and four times more than the Chinese(4). Most Australians want to change this, but the coal industry keeps their politicians on a short leash. Like New Labour over here, Rudd and Gillard’s administration was a government of flinchers. It has been punished for appeasing industrial lobbyists and the rightwing press.

Australian politics provides yet more evidence that climate science divides people along political lines. Abbott is no longer an outright denier, though he still insists, in the teeth of the facts, that the world has cooled since 1997(5). Some members of his party go further: Senator Nick Minchin, for example, maintains that “the whole climate change issue is a left-wing conspiracy to deindustrialise the western world”(6). (He has also insisted that cigarettes are not addictive and the link between passive smoking and illness cannot be demonstrated(7)). A recent poll suggests that 38% of politicians in Abbott’s coalition believe that man-made global warming is taking place, by comparison to 89% of Labor’s people(8).

It’s the same story everywhere. At a senatorial hustings in New Hampshire last week, all six Republican candidates denied that man-made climate change is taking place(9). Judging by its recent antics in the Senate and by primary campaigns all over the country, the Republican party appears to be heading towards a unanimous rejection of the science. The ultra-neoliberal Czech president Vaclav Klaus asserts that “global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so.”(10) The hard-right UK Independence Party may soon be led by Lord Monckton(11), the craziest man in British politics, who claims that action on climate change is a conspiracy to create a communist world government(12). The further to the right you travel, the more likely you are to insist that man-made climate change isn’t happening. Denial has nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics.

In the Telegraph recently, the Conservative Daniel Hannan tried to explain this association. “When presented with a new discovery, we automatically try to press it into our existing belief-system; if it doesn’t fit, we question the discovery before the belief-system.”(13) He’s right. We all do this, and it is also true that in some respects an antagonism to climate science is consistent with right-wing – and especially neoliberal – politics. The philosophy of the new right is summarised by this chilling statement from Vaclav Klaus. “Human wants are unlimited and should stay so.”(14)

But right-wing denial also leads to perverse outcomes. In a desperate attempt to appease the deniers in his party, Malcolm Turnbull proposed handing £70bn to industry to soften the impacts of acting on climate change(15). Rudd’s trading scheme, by contrast, was more or less self-financing. Tony Abbott intends to lavish subsidies on polluting companies without demanding any corresponding obligations(16). State handouts? Rights without responsibilities? When did these become conservative policies?

Since way back. In the US the Republicans also favour green incentives for industry, without caps or regulation. Worldwide, subsidies for fossil fuels are twelve times greater than subsidies for renewable energy(17). Many of the most generous hand-outs are awarded by right-wing governments (think of the money lavished on the oil industry under George W Bush(18)).

Yes, man-made climate change denial is about politics, but it’s more pragmatic than ideological. The politics have been shaped around the demands of industrial lobby groups, which happen, in many cases, to fund those who articulate them. Right-wingers are making monkeys of themselves over climate change not just because their beliefs take precedence over the evidence, but also because their interests take precedence over their beliefs.

www.monbiot.com

References:
1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11023889
2. http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/08/23/the-world%E2%80%99s-second-climate-change-election/
3. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/politics/the-town-that-turned-up-the-temperature/story-e6frgczf-1225809567009
4. US Energy Inhformation Administration, viewed 23rd August 2010. Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the Consumption of Energy. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=90&pid=45&aid=8&cid=&syid=2004&eyid=2008&unit=MMTCD
5. http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2008/s2748161.htm
6. ibid.
7. The Senate Community Affairs References Committee, December 1995. The tobacco industry and the costs of tobacco-related illness, p120. http://www.aph.gov.au/SENATE/COMMITTEE/CLAC_CTTE/completed_inquiries/pre1996/tobacco/report/report.pdf
8. The University of Queensland, 12th August 2010. Political Leaders and Climate Change, Table 7. http://gci.uq.edu.au/PLCCI.pdf
9. http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/20/every-gop-nh-senate-candidate-is-a-global-warming-denier/
10. http://newsbusters.org/node/10773
11. http://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2010/08/18/should-you-be-betting-on-101-lord-monckton/
12. http://mnfmi.org/2009/10/16/monckton-speaks-to-over-700-at-minnesota-free-market-institute-event/
13. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100050950/so-should-conservatives-believe-in-man-made-climate-change/
14. http://www.klaus.cz/clanky/2266
15. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6939147.ece

16. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/tony-abbotts-climate-change-plan-a-populist-con-job/story-e6frf7l6-1225826185124
17. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-29/fossil-fuel-subsidies-are-12-times-support-for-renewables-study-shows.html
18. http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2005/12/13/the-corporate-begging-bowl/

Compare Corangamite Candidate responses to 5 questions

Use our poll widget (right hand of this post) to help us send a clear message to Federal Candidates. To help with comparison, ORCA asked Federal Candidates for responses to the following questions:

1. Do you agree that human induced Climate Change requires urgent action?
2. Do you endorse the Beyond Zero Emissions stationary energy plan for 100% renewable energy by 2020?
3. Do you endorse a <350ppm target for Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere?
4. What support will you offer local Community Groups in transitioning to a low carbon economy?
5. What is your position on setting a price for carbon or introducing a tax on carbon dioxide emissions?

Responses are in order of receipt:

Greens Candidate, Mike Lawrence response:

1. Do you agree that human induced Climate Change requires urgent action?

Yes

2. Do you endorse the Beyond Zero Emissions stationary energy plan for 100% renewable energy by 2020?

Yes

3. Do you endorse a <350ppm target for Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere?

Yes

4. What support will you offer local Community Groups in transitioning to a low carbon economy?

Yes

5. What is your position on setting a price for carbon or introducing a tax on carbon dioxide emissions?

A carbon pollution tax based and applied to the source of CO2 and at a rate of $23 / ton and increasing to $70 / ton by 2015 is essential to attract the investment required to build base-load industrial renewable energy supply and ongoing energy security.


Liberal Candidate, Sarah Henderson’s response:

The Coalition respects the environment because we only have one planet to live on. We all want to hand down a cleaner, healthier and more sustainable Earth to our children. But we believe you don’t help the environment by damaging the economy. According to our calculations, the Rudd/Gillard ETS will saddled Australian families with annual cost increases of around $1,100 per household, while Australian businesses will face electricity cost increases of around 58 per cent over three years after its introduction in 2013. We are of the view that such policies would have a devastating effect on the Australian economy.

By contrast, Tony Abbott’s climate action policy provides incentives for Australian families and businesses to reduce their carbon emissions and focuses on meaningful, effective and direct action to improve Australia’s environment. This includes an Emissions Reduction Fund to provide direct incentives to industry and farmers to reduce CO2 emissions and a Green Corridors Initiative that will see 20 million trees planted by 2020 All in all, We think our incentive-based approach will reduce emissions as well as address some of Australia’s serious environmental problems.

Our economic dependence on oil is problematic in several respects. Much of the world oil market ends up subsidizing autocratic regimes in non-democratic countries where support for terrorism and the repression of women is common. We would be doing ourselves a favour, both in terms of national security and environmental sustainability, to develop cost-effective alternatives to fossil fuels. I believe that the solution to our problem of oil dependency will come from the private sector, and the best way to encourage the development of next generation fuel efficient technologies is through policies that promote entrepreneurial innovation.

——————————————————————
Take Action yourself – postcards for pollies:

The idea is that on or before Walk Against Warming day (August 14 or 15, depending on where you are) as many people as possible from across the country send a ‘postcard from home’ to BOTH the parliament office and electorate office addresses of the Prime Minister – and likewise to the addresses of the local electorate representative for those participating. Show them where you live and that you want action on climate change!

So, a Citizens’ Plea for action – on a postcard from home.

This call for action has been out to 60 other climate action
groups across the country; if only 10 people from or associated with
each group send cards, that’s 600 cards for each politician at each of
their two addresses; if 50 people join in that’s 3000 postcards! Hard
to ignore.

It would be fantastic if we would get at least 150 from each CAG
region – a real community consensus demonstrated with a citizen’s
assembly of 150 or more postcards for each region.

Sending to both offices increases the chance the message is heard at
least once. The arrival of several hundred post cards at the electorate office could result in a media event.

So ideally participants would each send out 4 four signed postcards,
each card carrying a quickly read message urging immediate action to
address climate change. The postcards show where the message is coming from – Ballina, Perth, Yarra Valley, Darwin etc.

Participants obtain or make their own cards. If four cards is too much, then please focus on the two for the PM.

A message suggestion is given below, with a bit of an explanation for
it below that. Ideally the cards would convey the same message, but
different groups and individuals may well have different priorities.
The main thing is make it clear that Labor is not doing anything like
enough to tackle climate change.

Anyway, further below we’ve given the parliamentary address for the PM and her electorate office address, as well as a link to addresses for
local electorate representatives.

Hon. Julia Gillard MP
PO Locked Bag 14 Werribee Vic 3030

Darren Cheeseman MP Federal Member for Corangamite
PO Box 625 Belmont 3216

Apologies for pointing out the obvious – you can get cards from newsagents, tourist info shops, hotels/motels etc – maybe even make
your own.

So please join us in sending postcards from home to the people we
employ to actively work in our interest. It won’t take much of your
time and will have impact.

Please forward this ‘call to cards’ to others in your network. Where
appropriate, please ask your family, friends and colleagues to send
cards.

Please also forward to activists you know in other climate and
environment groups. Our list of CAG addresses is not comprehensive.
Please spread the message as widely as you can – a ‘call to arms for
cards’.
——————————————————————–
EXAMPLE
———————–
Dear Julia,

Otway Ranges Climate Action (ORCA) members accept the conclusions of 30 years of rigorous science that a safe Climate is less than 300ppm of atmospheric CO2. We call on your Government to move rapidly to 100% renewable energy by 2020· Such a move forward will drive innovation, employment, and emissions reduction.

Please act now!

Sincerely ORCA.
—————————————————

ORCA meeting minutes – 2nd August 2010

ORCA Meeting Minutes: 02/08/2010

6:30pm

Apologies: Carol Head

Present: Simon Pockley, Matt Armstrong, Sue McKenzie, Amber and Ruby .

Chair: Matt Armstrong

Guest Speaker: Amber and Ruby.

The main Agenda Items were:

1. Sustainability at Apollo Bay – P-12 College: Amber and Ruby McKenzie.

· Described the Community garden
· Caring for Chooks
· Calves
· I sea, I care – marine wild life
· Dune action
· Ride to school day
· Fishing workshops
· Sailing
· Solar panels
· Wind turbine
· Recycling – nude food day
· Projectors to save on printing paper
· Paper limits
· Where to from here? Environmental club.

Decision to offer (small) financial support to the Environmental Club. Amber and Ruby to come back with suggestions

2. Report on Clean Energy Coast Forum as a Media Release

3. Corangamite Candidates

No responses to date

Meeting closed at 7:30pm